Sacramento Criminal Defense Lawyer Blog

The First Appellate Court of California last week issued a decision that should be heeded by any person facing criminal charges and considering a police offer to reduce or dismiss those charges in exchange for cooperation in an investigation. In short, the court said that only the district attorney has the authority to reduce or dismiss charges. Any defendant offered a deal by police to "make the charges go away" has to ask for explicit confirmation from the D.A.'s office before agreeing to cooperate. Without such approval, a cooperation agreement lacks authority and leaves the defendant with little recourse if the D.A. later decides to press charges.

The appellate court's decision had two parts. First, it said that, though little state case law exists on cooperation agreements, federal case law clearly says that agreements between law enforcement and defendants are not binding without the approval of prosecutors. Thus at the local level, the authority to bring charges against a defendant rests solely with the district attorney's office. To decide otherwise, the court argued, would raise the possibility that a junior member of a police force could on her own negotiate dismissal of charges in exchange for assistance with an investigation.

The second part of the court's decision dealt with constitutional issues. A cooperation agreement could be enforceable without prior consent of the district attorney only if there had been a violation of the defendant's due process rights, such as incriminating himself or forgoing the right to counsel. When there is no "detrimental reliance" involving a constitutional consequence, the cooperation agreement need not be enforced.

Obviously, the problem here is that few defendants are aware of the distinction between police and prosecutor (they're both looked at as part of one law enforcement team) and hardly any defendants will be aware of this appellate court decision. What we can end up with is some police officers taking advantage of this lack of understanding on the part of defendants and convincing them to cooperate without explaining the need for D.A. approval of reduction of charges. And according to this decision, the defendants will have few if any means to enforce a cooperation agreement if the D.A. balks.

Thus, the First Appellate Court's decision is a cautionary tale with a clear moral: If the police offer you a deal in exchange for cooperation, the first thing to do is demand to speak with a lawyer, and the second is demand confirmation from the district attorney's office. Without that explicit affirmation from prosecutors, a deal to help with an investigation in exchange for a shorter sentence or reduced charges is no deal at all.

Cases of this kind require representation by a quality criminal defense attorney. If you have questions about a cooperation agreement, call the Law Office of Nancy King for a free and confidential consultation.

People v. C.S.A.., Court of Appeal of the State of California, First Appellate District

A wet reckless is a negotiated plea bargain that in certain cases is an advantageous outcome to a DUI arrest. The term wet reckless doesn't actually appear in the California Vehicle Code but derives from the provisions of section 23103.5 VC. It is essentially a conviction of reckless driving with alcohol related circumstances.

As with all negotiated pleas, a wet reckless is seen as offering something to both sides. Though the prosecution gives up the chance to get a DUI conviction, it does get a conviction of the lesser charge of reckless driving, as well as the ability to count the wet reckless as a DUI if the defendant gets another DUI within ten years. And though the defendant agrees to plead guilty to reckless driving involving alcohol, he gets the benefit of avoiding some of the harsher penalties that come with a DUI.

Typically, district attorney's offices are open to negotiating a wet reckless when the defendant's blood alcohol level is at or just above the legal limit of .08 and/or the circumstances of the arrest and the quality of the evidence weaken the prosecution's case.

Advantages of a wet reckless over a DUI:

• Jail sentences are typically shorter or waived altogether since a wet reckless does not have a minimum required jail term like a DUI.
• Probation periods can be shorter, reducing the chances that a person will do something to violate the terms of probation and thus incur additional penalties.
• There is no mandated suspension of the driver's license, obviously important for people who drive to work or who drive vehicles as part of their employment, such as truck drivers or delivery company workers.
• People with professional licenses (for example, attorneys, doctors, and pharmacists) can avoid sanctions that would normally come with a DUI conviction.
• Fines are lower, usually half of those for a DUI.

Disadvantages of a wet reckless:

• Like a DUI, a wet reckless can result in increased insurance rates.
• If another DUI is received within 10 years, the wet reckless conviction is treated like a prior DUI conviction when determining penalties.
• The DMV, through its Administrative Per Se hearing, can still suspend the driver's license of someone who accepts a wet reckless plea. (See our November 27, 2009 post for a detailed explanation of DMV hearings.)

It's important to understand that a wet reckless can only be negotiated by your criminal defense lawyer before trial begins. The police cannot arrest you for a wet reckless and it is not a sentencing option after trial. If you've been arrested for a DUI and have questions about a wet reckless plea, call the Law Office of Nancy King at 916-442-1200.

While courtroom dramas on television and in the movies give the impression that most criminal legal cases end up in trial before a judge and jury, the reality is that the vast majority - over ninety percent - are resolved through negotiation. These negotiations, which take place between the defense attorney, prosecutor, and judge, result in a plea bargain, a judgment that falls somewhere between the prosecutor's desire for a conviction on all charges and the defendant's desire for a dismissal or finding of not guilty. District attorney's offices and judges are motivated to negotiate plea bargains because there aren't enough courtrooms, prosecutors, judges, and jurors to have all cases go to trial. Your defense lawyer has to be able to use this to get you the best possible deal.

A plea bargain can take many forms depending on the alleged crime, evidence, and defendant's criminal history. It might be that a charge is dropped from a felony to a misdemeanor or one charge is dropped altogether if there are multiple charges. It could also involve reduced jail time, deferred entry of judgment, jail alternatives, residential treatment, ankle monitoring or work project.

During negotiation, the defense attorney points out weak evidence, questionable aspects of the investigation and arrest, as well as case law that contradicts the prosecution's argument and supports the defendant's, all with the purpose of having the prosecution question the strength of the case. The defense counsel also points to mitigating factors such as a minimal criminal history. The best outcome is to have the charges dismissed altogether. But when that's not possible, the goal is to get penalties reduced to the absolute lowest level that the DA is willing to accept.

The process of negotiating a plea bargain highlights the importance of having an experienced and skilled defense attorney. To get the best deal for her client, the defense attorney needs to have an up-to-date understanding of the law, be familiar with past actions of prosecutors and judges, and possess superior negotiating skills. From our perspective, it's advantageous to have a defense attorney with past experience as a prosecutor, and thus an understanding of how the DA's office approaches the plea bargain process. This "inside" information is valuable negotiating power.

If you have any questions, call the Law Office of Nancy King (former Yolo County Deputy District Attorney).